3 operating systems that are not windows based




















Windows 8 was released on August 1, Windows 10 was the successor to Windows 8. Windows 10 featured fast start-up and resume, built-in security, and the return of the Start Menu in an expanded form. Any qualified device such as tablets, PCs, smartphones and Xbox consoles was able to upgrade to Windows 10, including those with pirated copies of Windows.

As of Sept. Aside from operating systems designed for use on personal computers PCs and laptops, Microsoft has also developed operating systems for servers, handheld devices, and mobile phones. Windows Server is a series of Microsoft server operating systems. The Windows Server name made its debut with the release of Windows Server and continues with the current release, Windows Server Home Server allowed users to share files such as digital photos and media files, and also automatically backed up home networked computers.

A version of the Windows operating system was designed for small devices such as personal digital assistants PDAs or Handheld PCs in the Microsoft vernacular. The mobile operating system for smartphones and mobile devices from Microsoft was based on the Windows CE kernel and designed to look and operate similar to desktop versions of Microsoft Windows.

Unlike Windows Mobile, Windows Phone 7 was targeted more to the consumer market than the enterprise market. Its successors included Windows Phone 8 and Windows 10 Mobile. Webopedia is an online information technology and computer science resource for IT professionals, students, and educators. Webopedia focuses on connecting researchers with IT resources that are most helpful for them.

Webopedia resources cover technology definitions, educational guides, and software reviews that are accessible to all researchers regardless of technical background. Property of TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation.

This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear.

TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace. Some of them are:. So, we have covered the six best alternative operating systems for Windows. Our list consists of both free and proprietary Operating Systems; Mac is an example for the latter.

So, wish you better computing, folks! I must agree that Linux is great way to go. It also runs fairly well on older hardware. Thanks for this informative article about operating systems, actually I was in dark regarding these OS choices until I found this article :.

Hi Abhijith, Great list of operating systems you have shared which is alternative to windows. But in those I love Ubuntu most because i have used that earlier. I will try Remix OS in future. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. Really appreciate for your amazing article.

Thank you for this valuable information. Thanks for sharing such a valuable information. I am not a techie and never thought I would be able to use Linux but this OS is quick and for a normal user very easy to get used to.

There are so many great online softwares and browser add ons available now that I think even non technical people like me will be able to use Lubuntu. I have it on dual boot but have not been back to Windows for months. I install it on every computer I service for older folks, that is running XP or Vista.

Installation is easier than MS. I am willing to pay for an alternative to MS, but my concern is software compatibility. They cover pretty well the world of software outside Windows and macOS.

Your email address will not be published. Skip to primary navigation Skip to main content Skip to footer. Last updated on: December 3, Ubuntu — The Free Windows Alternative. See also. The user experience is very similar to that of Linux and virtually all the software we can find for this operating system is free and open source too.

We can download FreeBSD from the following link. NetBSD was born as a free and open source operating system to bring users a free and accessible alternative to Unix.

This operating system, today, is compatible with more than 58 different hardware architectures, being one of the most versatile systems we can find. We can download NetBSD from the following link. Another operating system based on BSD totally free and open source. This system seeks to offer the maximum possible compatibility, comply with the norms, regulations and standards, offer proactive security and the most advanced cryptography.

In addition, it is capable of emulating binaries of various systems, such as Solaris, FreeBSD and Linux, among many others. We can download OpenBSD from the following link. This operating system is a version derived from FreeBSD. This system starts from FreeBSD 4. Its main features include BSD Installer, an installer to easily launch the system. This operating system derives from BSD and was developed by Sun Microsystems for workstations and servers in the early 90s.

Today it is obsolete, and who took over was Solari and OpenSolaris. ReactOS is an open source operating system whose main feature is that it is binary compatible with Windows. Not only can Windows PCs be equipped with incredible power, there's also an entire submarket in providing RGB lighting effects for everything from motherboards to memory sticks. If you're a gamer and you want to get your bling on, nothing beats PC gaming. If you could reach back in time 35 years ago and gently pluck an original Macintosh user from and put her in front of a brand new Mac, she would be able to operate today's machine.

The file system would look the same. The menu bar would look the same. Even the trash would look the same. Sure, instead of just a few thousand black and white pixels, the screens would be in glorious high-resolution color, and the speed, breadth, and depth of the applications would be mind-boggling, but the fundamental interface would be understandable. Macs have undergone fundamental processor changes, jumping from based devices to PowerPCs, migrating to Intel chips, and -- probably in the next few years -- migrating to Apple's own silicon.

But to the users, every single change in how the Mac has evolved has had a level of internal consistency and predictability unrivaled by any other platform. Interestingly, even though some aspects of the system remain effectively unchanged for more than three decades, that doesn't mean that MacOS feels particularly dated, although, as nearly every Mac user will admit, it does have its quirks. Although Macs have historically suffered far fewer malware threats than Windows machines, there has been a small rise in malware variants targeting MacOS users -- mostly for the contents of cryptocurrency wallets.

While it's not as existentially necessary to run an anti-malware program on a Mac, it's generally a good idea. Microsoft has recently starting bringing its Defender software to Macs , but right now, that's limited to enterprise use. We can't discuss MacOS without discussing Macintoshes. The two go together. While Windows can run on thousands of different machines from hundreds of different vendors, MacOS is distributed by Apple to run solely on Apple hardware.

There is a small, intrepid group of Hackintosh builders who source Macintosh compatible hardware and build their own systems , but they're outliers, and the process of building a Hackintosh takes some work.

A common misconception about Macintosh hardware is that it's more expensive than equivalent PC hardware. In fact, that's not true.

When I compared a highly equipped Mac mini against available PC parts , I was unable to source a PC with anywhere near the capability and size of the Mac mini. Where PCs are cheaper is when you're not looking at brand-name or spec-for-spec comparisons.

You can absolutely get cheaper laptops and desktops for Windows than Macs. Additionally, if you're willing sacrifice the Mac's legendary design and go for a traditional tower Windows PC, you can generally get more performance for the dollar.

Although the buy-in cost for Apple hardware is often more expensive, many have found that the overall cost of ownership over the lifetime of the system is less expensive with Macs. IBM did a study before the company decided to standardize on Macs, where they found that:.

PCs drive twice the amount of support calls. They're also three times more expensive. Macs are also appealing because of their design and integration.

MacOS is tightly integrated with iOS, to the point that you can even share clipboards between a Mac and an iPhone, or use an iPhone to take a picture that drops directly into a Mac application.

Although some Windows users may dispute this, many Mac users believe that MacOS is easier to install and update, offers faster updates with less hassle, and allows applications to be installed and managed with greater ease than Windows.

Out of the box, MacOS also comes with a deep range of applications for free, including the music composition tool GarageBand, video editing application iMovie, and a complete productivity package consisting of Pages word processing and layout , Numbers spreadsheet , and Keynote presentations.

While MacOS is often touted as an easy-to-use operating system, it also greatly appeals to design and development professionals. MacOS also has AppleScript, which can be used to automate complex workflows.

If you sufficiently equip your Mac and by this, I mean an i7 processor or better, 16GB of RAM or better, and definitely SSD instead of hard drive , you can use Parallels or another virtualization application to provide multiple operating systems on the Mac. This is a big appeal for me. I use a well-equipped Mac with Parallels, and I'm able to run Windows and Linux side by side with MacOS applications , even dragging and dropping across operating systems.

This level of flexibility is unmatched on any other OS. It's important to note that most Macs can't be upgraded. When you spec out your CPU, memory and storage, that's what you'll have to live with. While the new, Mac mini does allow RAM upgrades , it is a complex, tedious, and delicate process. Other machines, like the insanely expensive iMac Pro , allow RAM to be upgraded, but it requires a highly skilled technician to remove the permanently glued display and case to get at the machine's innards, voiding the warranty in the process..

With a virtualized copy of Windows, a Mac can be used to run any application you might need including Windows and Linux programs , where if you're running on a Windows machine, MacOS applications are not available.

Keep in mind, though, that you're limited to the hardware produced by Apple. If Apple chooses not to update a form factor or model for a few years as has happened a lot in recent years , you're out of luck for that hardware unless you decide to build a Hackintosh.

But with the advent of the T2 security chip last year, and the expected move to Apple-designed CPU chips, it may not be possible to home-build a Hackintosh for much longer. I have a Debian distribution running my home server. And in my various home devices, I have an uncountable number of Linux instances running, driving everything from my smart TVs to my Internet router.

Also: How to replace Windows 7 with Linux Mint. Linux is renowned for its versatility, particularly in servers and embedded solutions. But in this article, we're talking about desktop Linux implementations, where you'd use Linux with a keyboard and mouse to, at the very least, check your email.

Because it's open source, it can be modified and extended by anyone; a virtual army of loosely affiliated coders have been working on it for nearly 30 years. Also because it's open source, different variants called distributions have been released, containing everything from different core functionality to a wide variation of settings and configuration options, to different user interfaces, and even different fundamental purposes.

One reason many of the Linux faithful flock to the operating system is because it's not controlled by Microsoft or Apple. This can be something of a political preference or it can be a practical one: The desire or need to customize an OS at a level not permitted by a corporate overlord. For our desktop comparison though, let's focus on the truly practical.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000